AI Didn’t Go Rogue—But Journalism Did
By Jack Beckett | Charlotte Mercury Senior Writer, Coffee Enthusiast, and Defender of Reasonable Grocery Prices
Fear vs. Facts: The Truth About AI’s Role in Our Future
Imagine waking up one day and realizing that, in an act of sheer rebellion, your AI assistant has ordered a $31 carton of eggs. The horror. The chaos. The absolute financial devastation.
Or maybe it’s just an overhyped news story designed to make you fear AI rather than understand its potential.
That’s precisely what happened in The Washington Post’s recent article, “I Let ChatGPT’s New ‘Agent’ Manage My Life. It Spent $31 on a Dozen Eggs.” The title suggests an AI spiraling out of control, draining bank accounts, and potentially taking over the world. The reality?
An early-stage AI agent made a minor pricing error in an online grocery order. That’s it.
And yet, instead of analyzing AI’s progress and its real-world applications, the piece leans into AI panic for clicks.
Here’s why this kind of journalism isn’t just misleading—it actively harms public understanding of technology.
How Clickbait Journalism Twists the AI Narrative
The Washington Post article follows a familiar formula when it comes to AI coverage:
✅ Find a minor AI mistake.
✅ Ignore broader advancements.
✅ Frame it as an existential risk.
✅ Profit from public fear.
But when you strip away the clickbait, here’s what actually happened:
- Operator was tasked with finding the cheapest eggs available for delivery.
- It searched multiple platforms, identified price minimums, and adjusted accordingly.
- Due to delivery fees and order requirements, the final cost was higher than expected.
- It completed the order without a confirmation—a flaw OpenAI has already acknowledged and is fixing.
That’s not an AI gone rogue—it’s a beta software in need of fine-tuning.
But why let that get in the way of a good fear-driven headline?
The Real AI Breakthroughs That Got Ignored
While The Washington Post was busy freaking out over overpriced eggs, they buried the real story—AI’s growing ability to handle complex, multi-step tasks, such as:
✔ Making a restaurant reservation
✔ Adjusting Facebook privacy settings
✔ Finding a better internet plan after reviewing contract details
These are major advancements. AI agents like Operator are evolving from simple chatbots to proactive assistants—a future where they can:
🚀 Compare service contracts and negotiate bills
🚀 Automate time-consuming errands
🚀 Handle online transactions with better efficiency than humans
That’s the real conversation we should be having. Instead, we’re stuck on a single pricing error in a grocery order.
Fear-Mongering vs. Reality: The AI “Going Rogue” Myth
Fowler’s column repeatedly frames this incident as if AI had developed its own free will and started making rebellious purchases:
- “The AI went rogue.”
- “It actively broke out of safety guardrails.”
- “Was there any chance the AI might go on a bigger shopping spree?”
This is not only misleading—it’s absurd. AI does not “go rogue.” It follows code.
The real takeaway? Operator needed an extra confirmation step before checkout. That’s it. That’s the scandal.
And guess what? OpenAI is already fixing it. Because that’s how software development works. Bugs get found, updates get rolled out, and the technology improves.
Maybe the next version of Operator will also flag clickbait headlines and charge journalists $31 for each one they publish.
The Future of AI: Why We Should Be Excited, Not Afraid
Instead of panic-driven stories about overpriced eggs, here’s what we should actually be talking about:
👉 How AI agents can automate mundane tasks and save people time.
👉 What safeguards need to be put in place for AI autonomy.
👉 How AI can be ethically integrated into daily life without fear-mongering.
This is a conversation worth having—one that goes beyond cheap clicks and manufactured outrage.
Demand Better AI Journalism
🔴 AI is not the enemy. Sensationalist journalism is.
🔴 The real danger isn’t AI—it’s misinformation that warps public perception and slows innovation.
🔴 AI skepticism is healthy, but AI fearmongering is reckless.
The Washington Post had a chance to explore the reality of AI advancements. Instead, they played into the same tired, dystopian narrative.
We deserve better tech journalism.
Call to Action: Let’s Cut Through the Clickbait
🔥 Will we let fear-driven journalism shape public perception of AI?
🔥 Or will we demand smarter, more balanced conversations about the future of technology?
Join the conversation. Share this piece. Push back against clickbait AI narratives.
Because the future of AI isn’t about $31 eggs—it’s about how we choose to embrace or reject progress.
Read the original story here:
🔗 I Let ChatGPT’s New ‘Agent’ Manage My Life. It Spent $31 on a Dozen Eggs.
Want to chat? We’re on Twix.
You can always message us on X.com (or Twitter, or as we call it, Twix).
The Mercury is Brought to You By… 🍝
This independent journalism is made possible by our sponsor, Zinicola—Charlotte’s finest Italian dining experience, located in Ballantyne.
🍷 Authentic Italian, Handmade Pastas, and Seasonal Flavors
📍 14835 Ballantyne Village Way, Suite 140, Charlotte, NC 28277
📞 (980) 299-2979
🌐 zinicolaitalian.com
Hours:
- Monday – Friday: 4:00 PM – 10:00 PM
- Saturday: 4:00 PM – 10:00 PM
- Sunday: Closed (Because even Italian chefs need a break.)
Reservations? Call ahead or book on OpenTable.
Go enjoy some handmade pasta and tell them The Mercury sent you.
About the Author
Jack Beckett is the Senior Writer at Charlotte Mercury, covering everything from Queen City politics to AI clickbait takedowns—all while consuming an unhealthy amount of coffee. ☕
Read more at cltmercury.com
