A small edit buried in a 25-article zoning update could reshape food access in neighborhoods that have more warehouses than grocery stores.
Nobody put it on a poster. There was no press release. But buried inside a routine update to Charlotte’s Unified Development Ordinance — a document most residents will never read, let alone enjoy — is a rule change that could matter more to some Charlotte neighborhoods than almost anything else on the February 16 zoning agenda.
The city’s planning staff proposed, and council heard Monday night, an amendment that allows outdoor markets and farmers markets to operate by right in ML1, ML2, IC1, IC2, OFC, and OG zoning districts. Those are, in plain language, Charlotte’s manufacturing, logistics, light industrial, and flex office zones — the kinds of areas that generate truck traffic, warehouse jobs, and very few places to buy a head of lettuce.
Previously, those districts simply did not permit that use. If you wanted to run a weekend farmers market in an industrial corridor, the zoning said no. Now it would say yes, without requiring a separate petition, a public hearing, or a trip through the rezoning process.
What Changed, and Why It Was Blocked Before
Charlotte’s UDO, adopted several years ago as the city’s main land use rulebook, organized permitted uses by zoning district with a fairly rigid logic: industrial zones get industrial uses, residential zones get homes, and commercial zones get shops. Outdoor markets did not fit cleanly into that logic when the city was first drawing the lines.
The result was that many of the areas where a farmers market might do the most good — high-density industrial corridors with workers but few food options nearby — were legally off-limits to them.
The text amendment that went before council Monday night is part of a broader round of UDO updates the planning department described as routine maintenance: fixing inconsistencies, reflecting state law changes, and responding to what staff and outside stakeholders have encountered in practice since the ordinance took effect. Twenty-five of the UDO’s 39 articles are touched in this round.
The farmers market provision is one line among many. Staff described it as expanding food access in areas that rely heavily on manufacturing and logistics zoning. Council Member Joy Mayo called it something more pointed.
“Thinking Outside the Box”
Mayo, who represents District 3 in west and southwest Charlotte, was direct about what she sees in the change.
“In Black and Brown neighborhoods, we do have a larger influx of industrial complexes and zoning,” she said during Monday’s hearing. She mentioned the Bowl — a local organization working on food access issues — as an example of the kind of group that could use this opening. “This could give us opportunities to work innovatively to bring fresh fruits and vegetables to historically underserved communities.”
That’s a specific claim about who lives where, what zoning has historically done to those neighborhoods, and who stands to benefit from a regulatory change that, on its face, just involves a list of permitted uses.
The zoning code does not by itself produce a farmers market. It just stops prohibiting one. Someone still has to organize it, fund it, staff it, and show up on Saturdays. But the previous rule meant that even if a community wanted a market in an ML1 corridor, the paperwork stood in the way. That barrier is now gone, if council votes to adopt the amendment after the zoning committee reviews it in March.
How the Process Works From Here
Monday night was a public hearing, not a final vote. The amendment — petition 2025-118, filed by the city’s own planning staff — goes next to the zoning committee of the planning commission, which meets March 3 at 5:30 p.m. That committee will make a recommendation, and council will take a final vote at a subsequent meeting.
There was no opposition. No speakers signed up against it. Several council members asked questions about the ADU portions of the amendment, but no one objected to the farmers market language specifically.
Council Member LaWanna Mayfield echoed her colleague’s point, noting that thinking through zoning for food access “gives us an opportunity to be part of the solution” even if housing and food security are technically county-level concerns. Council Member Malcolm Graham complimented staff for treating the UDO as the living document they promised it would be when it was adopted.
Zoning committee chair Douglas Welton noted that members of the public are welcome to attend the March 3 meeting at charlotteplanning.org, though it is not a continuation of Monday’s hearing.
The Larger Picture
This change does not fix food access in Charlotte. It removes one regulatory obstacle for people trying to address it. Those are different things, and it’s worth being clear about which one just happened.
Charlotte has industrial corridors where grocery stores are sparse and food options run toward fast food near highway interchanges. Zoning did not create that pattern alone — decades of investment decisions, redlining, highway routing, and retail economics all played a role. But zoning has enforced it, quietly, by determining what uses are allowed to exist where.
A single line in a land use ordinance will not undo that. But it does stop the rulebook from actively blocking people who want to try.
That, to be honest, is how most zoning changes work. They are not grand gestures. They are adjustments to a long list of what is and is not permitted, in which the stakes are mostly invisible until you are the person on the wrong side of the list.
This is the Charlotte Mercury. We read the list.
This article is based on the public hearing record from the Charlotte City Council Zoning Meeting of February 16, 2026. The full amendment — petition 2025-118 — is available through charlotteplanning.org. More zoning and land use coverage lives at cltmercury.com/zoning/ and cltmercury.com/city-council/.
About the Author
Jack Beckett is a senior writer for The Charlotte Mercury, where he covers zoning, land use, local government, and the slow accumulation of decisions that quietly reshape a city while everyone else is stuck in traffic. He has read more UDO amendments than is probably advisable for a person who also enjoys being invited to dinner parties. He is powered by an unreasonable amount of coffee — black, always, because life is already complicated enough — and a sincere belief that land use law is actually interesting if you explain it correctly. He has not yet been proven wrong. Reach him, or argue with him, on X.com/queencityexp, which we call Twix around here, because the rebrand didn’t stick and neither does most of what that platform calls itself these days.
The Fine Print
The Charlotte Mercury does not track you, sell your data, or auto-play anything at you. We think that’s a reasonable way to operate a news site. If you want to confirm this, or simply read the documents that govern what we do and how we do it, here is everything you need:
Privacy Policy — the actual rules, not the vague reassurances · About Us — who we are and why we exist · Terms of Service — the legal part, written like adults · Media & Advertising — if you’re a business that wants to work with us without doing anything gross · Contact Us — if you have tips, corrections, or just want to tell us we’re wrong about something. We read it.
You can also find us at cltmercury.com/news, cltmercury.com/politics, and, as noted above, on Twix.
Creative Commons License
© 2026 The Charlotte Mercury
This article, “Charlotte Just Changed Who Gets to Sell You a Tomato,” by Jack Beckett is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0.
“Charlotte Just Changed Who Gets to Sell You a Tomato” by Jack Beckett, The Charlotte Mercury (CC BY-ND 4.0)