Mecklenburg Commissioners Hear Housing Appeals, Reset A Home for All, and Approve SoFi Incentive

Mecklenburg County’s Year-End Meeting Had Holiday Cheer, and Then the Hard Stuff

The Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners convened Tuesday, Dec. 16, for its regular meeting at the Charlotte Mecklenburg Government Center, closing out the year with a familiar mix of civic ceremony and consequential housekeeping, plus a few moments that landed like a cold gust through the chamber doors. The agenda ranged from homelessness strategy and board appointments to a public hearing on incentives for a fast-growing fintech.

The Opening: Mission, Priorities, and a Holiday Video

Chair Mark Jerrell opened with an invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance, then repeated the board’s mission, vision, and stated FY 2026–2027 priorities, a list that reads like the county’s job description: economic development, education, environmental stewardship, health equity and wellness, services for seniors, workforce development, and reducing racial disparities.

Before public comment, the board played a holiday thank-you video produced by county communications, then recognized Barbara Blyweiss, a Soil and Water Conservation Commissioner, in attendance.

“A Home for All” Gets a Reset in the Paperwork

Buried in the meeting materials was a significant pivot point: an update on “A Home for All,” the county’s homelessness strategy framework, labeled as a new staff briefing item. The staff briefing document describes a shift to “A Home for All 2.0,” with Mecklenburg County taking the lead on operations, the Foundation for the Carolinas taking the lead on fundraising, and a reworked governance structure intended to align more closely with the existing Continuum of Care framework.

The document is unusually candid about why the reset is happening. It describes slow progress toward implementation goals, private fundraising that is not on track, and a strategy operating on a parallel governance track with many of the same partners. It also notes the county provides 100% of operational funding, and that a transition to the new model “will not exceed current allocation,” and “will be less.”

There is also a staffing component with a price tag. The briefing lists an annualized staffing cost of $697,114. It states the positions require BOCC authorization, including a senior social services manager role focused on access to the “front door” of the homelessness system, management analysts, a data and evaluation analyst, and administrative support.

A public announcement is anticipated in January 2026, according to the document.

Public Comment Turns Into a Housing and Health Symposium

Public appearances began with Denisha DeGraffen Reid, who used her time to talk about mental health, substance use, and how the holidays can amplify stress. She urged people to treat others with more patience and less aggression, including on the roads.

Then the meeting took on the shape of a civic case study: how public dollars, private capital, and service providers get braided together into housing outcomes, and what happens when any strand frays.

Atrium Health’s Role in Affordable Housing, Told in Numbers and Stories

Mark Hetridge, speaking on behalf of the Housing Impact Fund and Ascent Housing, described partnerships with Mecklenburg County aimed at preserving naturally occurring affordable housing and keeping units accessible across income bands. He focused on Atrium Health as a key partner, citing capital commitments and project examples, including Hill Rock Estates.

Liz Clayson Kelly, CEO of Roof Above, followed with a front-line framing: preventing and ending homelessness requires both housing solutions for very low-income residents and preservation of naturally occurring affordable units. She pointed to Hill Rock Estates as an example of both approaches operating in one place, and described health and psychiatric support partnerships connected to Atrium.

Members of Atrium’s workforce also spoke. Joseph Fuller described using Atrium’s housing support to regain stability, renew a lease, reunite with his children, and avoid losing housing while facing stage 4 cancer. Brian Donato described internal assistance work aimed at helping Atrium teammates avoid eviction and secure housing through combined programs.

Don Jonas, representing Atrium Health’s community health efforts, told the board the organization views housing as essential to health and described multiple initiatives, including investments, supportive housing and health programs, and street psychiatry.

The Pearl, Tax Increment Financing, and a Dispute Over “Promises”

Colin Lane, speaking as point person for “The Pearl” project for Atrium Health, argued that public narratives about the project’s affordable housing commitments are inaccurate. He described the project as early in a 15-year tax increment grant timeline, emphasized that reimbursement has not yet occurred, and laid out housing-related steps, including developer filings and a land contribution concept.

His remarks did not end the debate so much as underline the problem: in housing politics, the fight is rarely over whether the crisis exists. It is over who is responsible for which piece of the solution, and when.

Appointments: The Quiet Power of Boards, and a Question About How Seats Get Filled

The board moved through multiple appointments and reappointments, including:

Historic Landmarks Commission: Matthew Browder was appointed to fill an unexpired term expiring July 30, 2027.
CPCC Board of Trustees: nominations were made for multiple candidates, and the chair noted board policy requires interviews.
Agricultural Advisory Board: four recommended appointees were approved.
Mecklenburg EMS Joint Agency Board of Commissioners: multiple reappointments were approved.
Mint Hill Board of Adjustment: a reappointment was approved.

One exchange was worth pausing on. Commissioner George Dunlap raised a concern about recommendation processes generally, suggesting the board often receives a name but not enough information about why that person, and what skill gap is being filled. Chair Jerrell directed the clerk’s office to draft clearer expectations for future recommendation letters.

It was a small procedural moment with big implications. Boards and commissions do not just “advise.” They decide historic designations, steer programs, shape institutions, and in practice, influence what gets built, preserved, and funded. The pipeline matters.

The SoFi Incentive: A Public Hearing With No Public Speakers, and One No Vote

At 6:30 p.m., the board opened a public hearing on a proposed Business Investment Program grant for SoFi Technologies, Inc., and then closed it after no members of the public spoke.

Clay Andrews, with the county’s Office of Economic Development, presented the deal terms.

Here is what the county materials say the project involves:

$3 million in taxable investment, including $1.2 million in real property and $1.8 million in business personal property.
250 new employees, with an average wage listed as $116,268.
Proposed location: 13034 Ballantyne Corporate Place, in Commission District 6.
Competitive sites: Jacksonville, Florida, and Frisco, Texas.
County grant: a 75% grant over five years, capped at $39,354.

The packet also lists additional incentives from the City of Charlotte and the state, totaling $2,400,709 across jurisdictions.

One detail that reads differently when printed in black and white: the SoFi resolution states that the board voted to express its intent to provide the grant during a closed-session meeting on Oct. 7, 2025.

The board ultimately voted to approve the grant, with one commissioner voting no. The meeting did not identify the dissenting commissioner in the portion available here. (Meeting Video)

For broader context, state and city announcements tied to the same SoFi expansion described 225 new jobs and a Ballantyne hub, though the county hearing materials presented to commissioners list 250.

Two consent items were pulled by Commissioner Vilma D. Leake.

C-PACE: Joining a Statewide Financing Program, Without Pledging the County’s Credit

The board adopted a resolution authorizing Mecklenburg County to participate in the Commercial Property Assessed Capital Expenditure (C-PACE) program. The resolution explicitly states that nothing in it authorizes Mecklenburg County to pledge or encumber its full faith and credit in connection with any C-PACE financing.

Public Health: Federal Reductions, and a New $20,000 Grant

The board also approved a Health Department budget amendment that:

Decreases federal revenue and expenses by $41,300 from the Refugee Health Assessments Program to the General Fund.
Decreases federal revenue and expenses by $53,840 from the Mecklenburg EtE Implementation Program to the General Fund.
Decreases federal revenue and expenses by $7,448 from the Child Fatality Prevention Team Program to the General Fund.
Recognizes and appropriates $20,000 from The Center for Black Health and Equity, and adopts the related grant project ordinance.

The grant ordinance states that the $20,000 funding is tied to the Center’s Networking2Save program and is intended to support community capacity building, training, and technical assistance for coalition development in the Charlotte Mecklenburg area.

Commissioner Reports: Transit, Parks, Violence, and a Jolt on Immigration Detention Claims

The meeting’s final stretch shifted from votes to personal, sometimes unscripted commentary.

Commissioners praised Vice Chair Leigh Altman, and county staff, for service and the earlier recognition video.
Commissioner Dunlap highlighted Parks and Recreation programming, including an event at Eastway Regional Recreation Center and a Partners for Parks contribution referenced in remarks.
Altman urged the public to tune in for the inaugural meeting of the new transit authority board, later correcting the date to Thursday at 6 p.m.
Commissioner Griffin reflected on supporting children regardless of economic background.
Commissioner Leake warned about youth violence and urged families to pay attention to environments and influences.
Commissioner Susan Rodriguez McDowell said she had learned more that day about people being detained in Mecklenburg County by ICE and Border Patrol, described conditions as “deplorable,” and said she would seek more information about where detention is happening and how it is occurring.

Chair Jerrell closed with end-of-year thanks to staff across the county, including clerk support, audio-visual staff, and security, then adjourned.

What Happens Next

The agenda lists upcoming meetings through January, including a CMS and BOCC joint meeting on Jan. 8, 2026; a possible budget and public policy workshop on Jan. 13; a regular meeting on Jan. 21 that includes the first budget public hearing; and the board’s annual retreat later in January.

About the Author

Jack Beckett is the senior writer for The Charlotte Mercury, covering how local power works in practice, who benefits, and why the fine print keeps winning elections. This was filed with coffee strong enough to qualify as a public utility, and with deep sympathy for the clerk’s office, which keeps the wheels on the machine while the rest of us debate where the wheels should go.

Want more? On The Charlotte Mercury you can read the latest in News, dig into Politics, find the official stuff on About Us, send tips or questions through Contact Us, and see exactly how we handle your data on our bluntly named Privacy Policy. If you want to argue, praise, or send a screenshot of something that should not be real but is, there is always Twix.

Creative Commons License

© 2025 The Charlotte Mercury / Strolling Ballantyne
This article, “Mecklenburg Commissioners Hear Housing Appeals, Reset A Home for All, and Approve SoFi Incentive,” by Jack Beckett is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0.

“Mecklenburg Commissioners Hear Housing Appeals, Reset A Home for All, and Approve SoFi Incentive”
by Jack Beckett, The Charlotte Mercury (CC BY-ND 4.0)